Pedagogical Discourse in Higher Professional Education of the Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.10.10.1Keywords:
educational perspectives, educational strategies, education, higher education, pedagogy, educational developmentAbstract
Scientific discourse in the pedagogical sphere implies coverage of the activity of all subjects of the educational space. Scientific exploration aims to coordinate the positions of education applicants, teachers, and representatives of the administrative cluster possible in the organization of a comprehensive pedagogical discourse. The task of the article is to develop effective theoretical-methodological and practically oriented guidelines, which will become a reference point for the construction of higher professional education of the future. The methodological arsenal for conducting this type of research served as general scientific, educational-pedagogical, and philosophical methods. The key issues shaping the agenda of pedagogical discourse on the prospects of education are the definition of short-term pedagogical innovations and long-term strategies for the development of higher professional education. A promising area of research is the correlation between the potential of the educational environment and the potential of socio-cultural space. Thus, pedagogical discourse is called to implement synergetic models of educational development. Despite the conservatism of education, the present and, even more so, the future of this sphere requires innovative transformations. Scientific-technological and humanitarian-informational progress allows updating education and forecasting its development based on further transformations. Higher vocational education is in dire need of constant updating of the pedagogical discourse because the abilities and skills acquired (acquired) by future professionals immediately turn into indicators of professionalism, which is a determining factor in the competitive environment of the modern world. Flexibility, mobility, multidisciplinarity, openness, accessibility, efficiency - are the attitudes that guide the construction of future education perspectives and meet the principles of dynamism in this sphere of social activity.
References
Anderson, V. (2020). A digital pedagogy pivot: Re-thinking higher education practice from an HRD perspective. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1778999
Ashby, I., & Exter, M. (2019). Designing for interdisciplinarity in higher education: Considerations for instructional designers. TechTrends, 63(2), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0352-z
Barrie, S., & Pizzica, J. (2019). Reimagining university curriculum for a disrupted future of work: Partnership pedagogy. In J. Higgs, W. Letts, & G. Crisp (Ed.), Education for employability. Practice futures (vol. 2, pp. 143–152). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004418707_012
Beligatamulla, G., Rieger, J., Franz, J., & Strickfaden, M. (2019). Making pedagogic sense of design thinking in the higher education context. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0006
Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2020). Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(3), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746
Dlouhá, J., Heras, R., Mulà, I., Salgado, F. P., Henderson. L. (2019). Competences to address SDGs in higher education – A reflection on the equilibrium between systemic and personal approaches to achieve transformative action. Sustainability, 11(13), Article 3664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133664
Diachok, N., Chernukha, N., Tokaruk, L., Udovenko, I., & Petrova, M. M. (2020). The practical-oriented concept as a principle of professional education of the future professionals. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p272
Ergas, O., & Hadar, L. L. (2019). Mindfulness in and as education: A map of a developing academic discourse from 2002 to 2017. Review of Education, 7, 757–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3169
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2018). The influence of sociocultural and structural contexts in academic change and development in higher education. Higher Education, 76(6), 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0254-1
Henderson, J. B., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2018). Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
Langset, I. D., Jacobsen, D., & Haugsbakken, H. (2018). Digital professional development: towards a collaborative learning approach for taking higher education into the digitalized age. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-01-03
Leal Filho, W., Raath, S., Lazzarini, B., Vargas, V. R., de Souza, L., Anholon, R. … Orlovic, V. (2018). The role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.017
Luo, T., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). “Like, comment, and share” – professional development through social media in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1659–1683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5
Matthews, A. (2021). Sociotechnical imaginaries in the present and future university: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of UK higher education texts. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1864398
Murphy, M. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749
Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C. … Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a practice-based professional development program on elementary teachers’ facilitation of and student engagement with scientific argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059
Panke, S., & Stephens, J. (2018). Beyond the echo chamber: Pedagogical tools for civic engagement discourse and reflection. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 248–263. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26273884
Parkhouse, H., Lu, C. Y., & Massaro, V. R. (2019). Multicultural education professional development: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 416–458. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319840359
Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., Rosas-Casals, M. (2018). Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085
Tran, L. T., & Phuong Vu, T. T. (2018). Agency in mobility: towards a conceptualisation of international student agency in transnational mobility. Educational Review, 70(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1293615
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 auhtors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
