Scientific innovations and advanced technologies in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.10.11.2Keywords:
innovation, technology, higher education, EuropeAbstract
The modern transformation of the role of education affects the consideration and improvement of the methodological princes of education. At the same time, the constant development of the educational sector entails the justification of the use of certain scientific innovations and advanced technologies in the system of higher education, which is the actual task of this pedagogical research. The object of the study is innovation and advanced technology in higher education. The aim of the work is to highlight innovative means, methods, and technologies in higher education, which are promising mechanisms for improving the university system of Latvia. Pedagogical methods of research (theoretical and empirical) are used in the work. Among theoretical methods of pedagogical cognition, we will distinguish analysis, synthesis, concretization, and abstraction, systemic and functional methods. The empirical methods of research used observation, experiment, and rating method, the basis of which formed the key recommendations for the implementation of the analyzed learning technologies. The results analyzed a number of problems, in particular, the issues of innovative changes in European higher education, modern advanced technologies of learning in higher education, innovative, methods, forms of development of higher education, the problem of STEM-education functioning in Latvia. The scientific novelty of the research is the proposed synthetic analysis of actual innovative methods and technologies in the system of higher education. The practical value of the work consists in the formation of recommendations for further use of innovative methods of higher education development. In the conclusion, it is summarized that the use of innovative teaching methods is an important part of modern European education. At the same time, the main advanced technologies turn to the individual development of the student, improvement of his practical skills.
References
Aghion, F., Cherif, R., & Hasanov, F. (2021). Competition, Innovation, and Inclusive Growth. IMF Working Papers, 2021(080), 1-7. doi:10.5089/9781513574172.001
Cherng, H.-Y. S., & Davis, L. A. (2019). Multicultural Matters: An Investigation of Key Assumptions of Multicultural Education Reform in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117742884Cherng
Downton, M. P. (2017). Preparation for future teaching. Innovative Practices in Teacher Preparation and Graduate-Level Teacher Education Programs, 293-305. https://doi.org/10.4018/978- 1-5225-3068-8.ch016
Fuad, D. R. S. M., Musa, K., & Hashim, Z. (2020). Innovation culture in education: A systematic review of the literature. Management in Education, doi:10.1177/0892020620959760
González, M. J., Surikova, S., & Pigozne, T. (2020). Adaptation of a teacher training programme for character education to the Latvian context. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2020.01
Hamzah, N., Ahmad, M. F., Zakaria, N., Ariffin, A., & Rubani, S. N. K. (2021). Technical and Vocational Education Students’ Perception of Using Learning Videos during Covid-19 Pandemic Period. У 2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS). IEEE. doi:10.1109/i2cacis52118.2021.9495895
Howard, S. K., Schrum, L., Voogt, J., & Sligte, H. (2021). Designing research to inform sustainability and scalability of digital technology innovations. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09913-y
Kotyk, T., Romanyuk, S., Bogush, A., Rudenko, Y., & Nepomniashcha, I. (2021). Innovative and project activities of future education. Laplage em revista, 7(3B), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202173b1539p.213-219
Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
Petrenko, L., Kravets, S., Bazeliuk, O., Maiboroda, L., & Muzyka, I. (2020). Analysis of the current state of distance learning in the vocational education and training institutions. E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 10010. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016610010
Protsyk, H. M. (2020). Project method: past and future. Medical education, (1), 67–71. doi:10.11603/me.2414-5998.2020.1.10996
Skvorcova, O., Stavicka, A., & Odiņa, I. (2020). Subjective well-being of international students in Latvian higher education institutions. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2020.18
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
