The Problem of Pedagogical Innovations and Trends in the Development of the Educational Environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.16

Keywords:

education transformation, education perspectives, educational strategies

Abstract

Pedagogical innovations are an important component of the educational environment both in the period of its sustainable development and in times of change and transformation. Characteristic features of new ideas of educational and pedagogical space are their dynamism and continuity. If the educational system has its fundamental stages of development (approval, functioning, transformation), the practically oriented cluster of pedagogy is always focused on progress in the form of changes, improvements, and transformations. The purpose of scientific exploration is to structure and systematize pedagogical innovations in the main segments of the educational environment. The article aims to determine the differences between the declarative elements of innovative educational strategies and the practical implementation of pedagogical innovations demanded by time and reality. The methodological basis for scientific research is concentrated around general scientific, scientific- pedagogical, and philosophical-scientific segments. Prospective directions of pedagogical innovations research is to determine the role in the development of the educational environment and to develop mechanisms to overcome the problems associated with pedagogical innovations in the education system. So, the range of problematic issues on pedagogical innovations concerns the following moments: the mismatch between the needs of the educational environment and innovative manifestations; risks caused by the aggressiveness of innovation and its negative impact on the fundamental educational principles; socio-cultural realities that do not allow the implementation of educational innovation in different dimensions (global, regional, professional).

Author Biography

Yaroslav Tsekhmister, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Science, Professor, Ed. D, PhD Degree Applicant, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID: 0000-0002-7959-3691

Scopus Author: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=35747165900

References

Butler-Henderson, K., & Crawford, J. (2020). A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity. Computers & Education, 159, Article 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104024

Cañado, M. (2018). CLIL and pedagogical innovation: Fact or fiction?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12208

Costa, L., Cardoso, T., & Pestana, F. (2021). Microsoft teams as a pedagogical innovation triggered during an emergency remote learning context. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), 14th International conference of education, research and innovation (ICERI2021) (pp. 8396–8402). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2021.1935

Diningrat, S., Nindya, M., & Salwa, S. (2020). Emergency online teaching: Early childhood education lecturers' perception of barrier and pedagogical competency. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 705–719. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32304

Gaffarov, Y. (2019). Technical approach in the education system. International Journal on Integrated Education, 2(6), 40–41. https://www.neliti.com/publications/333852/technical-approach-in-the-education-system

Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6

Garzón, J., Kinshuk, V., Baldiris, S., Gutiérrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, Article 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334

Guan, C., Mou, J., & Jiang, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data- driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(4), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2020.09.001

Halász, G. (2018). Measuring innovation in education: The outcomes of a national education sector innovation survey. European Journal of Education, 53, 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12299

Heileman, G., Abdallah, C., Slim, A., & Hickman, M. (2018). Curricular analytics: A framework for quantifying the impact of curricular reforms and pedagogical innovations. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.09676

Hero, L.-M., & Lindfors, E. (2019). Students’ learning experience in a multidisciplinary innovation project. Education+Training, 61(4), 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2018-0138

Howard, P., Becker, C., Wiebe, S., Carter, M., Gouzouasis, P., McLarnon, M. … Schuman, L. (2018). Creativity and pedagogical innovation: Exploring teachers’ experiences of risk-taking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 850–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1479451

Lee, W. O., & Tan, J. P. (2018). The new roles for twenty-first-century teachers: Facilitator, knowledge broker, and pedagogical weaver. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen, The teacher’s role in the changing globalizing world: Resources and challenges related to the professional work of teaching (pp. 11–31). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_002

Morreale, S., Thorpe, J., & Westwick, J. (2021). Online teaching: challenge or opportunity for communication education scholars?. Communication Education, 70(1), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1811360

Mykhailyshyn, H., Kondur, O., & Serman, L. (2018). Innovation of education and educational innovations in conditions of modern higher education institution. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.5.1.9-16

Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of a learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8

Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Galloway, N. (2021). Global Englishes and language teaching: A review of pedagogical research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000518

Sunley, R., Harding, L., & Jones, J. (2019). Realising creativity in management education: Putting student energy into action. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.02.007

Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and pedagogical models: analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright, 7(2), 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311

Sysoieva, S. (2021). Digitalization of education: pedagogical priorities. Education: Modern Discourses, (4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.37472/2617-3107-2021-4-02

Downloads

Published

2021-12-25

How to Cite

Tsekhmister, Y. (2021). The Problem of Pedagogical Innovations and Trends in the Development of the Educational Environment. Futurity Education, 1(2), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.16