Peculiarities of the Implementation of the Principles of the Education of the Future Analysis of the Main Dilemmas

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.29

Keywords:

education of the future, Uzbekistan, Eurocentricity

Abstract

Recent trends in the development of education demonstrate the need for gradual changes in this area in Uzbekistan. The direction of transformation, which is needed in the sphere of educational organization, determines the need to borrow foreign, especially European experience. The established problems have been on the margins of attention of researchers, which further emphasizes the relevance for further interpretations and discussion. The article aims to analyze the main dilemmas (in the example of Uzbekistan) related to the chosen path and the peculiarities of implementing the principles of education of the future. It should be noted that consideration of the main objectives also implies addressing the issues of important practices of the educational process organization, in particular in the sphere of school and university education and education for sustainable development. The main methods used in the work were: comparativistic, method of abstraction, deductive-axiomatic method, concretization. The results state that today for Uzbekistan the convergence of the national education system with the European models is relevant. Important elements are the introduction of a credit-module system of training, and the beginning of the application of continuous education for sustainable development with new paradigms aimed not only at memorizing the material but also - on the development of critical thinking. New benchmarks for the educational system should become STEM, a change of curricula, and training systems for pedagogical professionals. In conclusion, it is noted that the key principle for the development of future Uzbek education is Eurocentricity. The latter is aimed at the formation of a modern specialist with creative, leadership skills and developed critical thinking.

References

Abdullakhanova, G., & Alimatova, N. (2020). Digitalization of the education system in Uzbekistan. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 2(12), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue12-56

Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206

Ali, M., & Abdel-Haq, M. K. (2021). Bibliographical analysis of artificial intelligence learning in higher education: Is the role of the human educator and educated a thing of the past?. In M. Ali & T. Wood-Harper (Eds.), Fostering communication and learning with underutilized technologies in higher education (pp. 36–52). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4846-2.ch003

Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Lund, A., & Strømme, T. A. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005

Clarà, M., Mauri, T., Colomina, R., & Onrubia, J. (2019). Supporting collaborative reflection in teacher education: A case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576626

Cohen, D. K., Spillane, J. P., & Peurach, D. J. (2018). The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17743488

Ehlers, U.-D. (2019). Future skills and higher education “future skill readiness”. In Connecting through educational technology: Proceedings of the European distance and e-Learning network 2019 annual conference (pp. 85–96). EDEN. https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2019-ac-0011

Francis, B., Mills, M., & Lupton, R. (2017). Towards social justice in education: contradictions and dilemmas. Journal of Education Policy, 32(4), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1276218

Head, G. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315

Ismoilovna, O. F., & Oripovna, E. U. (2020). Education in Uzbekistan: Credit-module system, new approaches, and views. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 02(12), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume02issue12-50

Herţanu, C.-L. (2020). Future education within disruptive technologies developments. International conference Knowledge-based organization, 26(2), 288–293. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2020-0092

Karabaevna, Z., Musurmanova, A., & Xamroevich, R. (2019). Improving the competence of future vocational education teachers based on modular-rating education. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 6903–6906. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.a2997.109119

Kohlberg, L. (2010). Resolving moral conflicts within the just community 1. In C. Harding (Ed.), Moral dilemmas and ethical reasoning (pp. 71–98). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315124704

Kopnina, H. (2018). Education for sustainable development (ESD): The turn away from ‘environment’ in environmental education?. In K. Van Poeck, J. A. Lysgaard, & A. Reid (Eds.), Environmental and sustainability education policy: International trends, priorities and challenges (pp. 135–153). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732359

Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6

Ngozwana, N. (2018). Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research methodology: Researcher’s reflections. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.1.19

Novianti, N. (2017). Teaching character education to college students using bildungsromans. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10415a

Protsyk, H. M. (2020). Project method: Past and future. Medical education, (1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.11603/me.2414-5998.2020.1.10996

Reid, A. M., Brown, J. M., Smith, J. M., Cope, A., & Jamieson, S. (2018). Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2

Siddikov, R. (2021). Higher education and training in Uzbekistan on the eve of independence. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 03(02), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume03issue02-14

Walsh, G., McGuinness, C., & Sproule, L. (2019). It’s teaching … but not as we know it: Using participatory learning theories to resolve the dilemma of teaching in play-based practice. Early Child Development and Care, 189(7), 1162–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1369977

Welsh, R. O., & Little, S. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791582

Downloads

Published

2022-09-25

How to Cite

Rakhimov, T., & Mukhamediev , M. (2022). Peculiarities of the Implementation of the Principles of the Education of the Future Analysis of the Main Dilemmas. Futurity Education, 2(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.29