Analysis of Tends in the Development of the Educational Environment: Education of the Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.24Keywords:
educational environment, approaches to the development of the educational environment, technological and socio-cultural trends of educational changeAbstract
As the experience of the world pandemic has shown, constraints are also a source of innovation. Education was able to cope with the challenges that confronted the world during the lockdown. Since then, education has developed in an environment full of uncertainty. The paper analyzes the problems of the development of the modern educational environment. The aim is to describe the main trends of changes in the educational environment, to identify the triggers of new trends in the perspective of modern educational reforms and global transformations. Theoretical methods were used: analysis of scientific-pedagogical research, synthesis of research results, and the main transformations of education in Poland. The empirical method of research in combination with the modern method of the survey online focus group, observation, and survey (closed questionnaire survey) was used. The closed questionnaire method of the study, observation, and survey of teachers of experimental and control institutions of higher education allowed to highlight the main issues of the study. The results of the study showed that new trends in the educational environment are influenced by external and internal factors and processes: global, geopolitical, technological, and socio-cultural. Among them: accessibility of education, changes in teaching methods, new learning skills, lifelong learning, the introduction of new educational start-ups, educational technology. Scientific novelty - the results of the work allowed to identify problematic points, the main trends of development, and to express a hypothesis about the presentation of the education of the future. The practical significance of the article is that further research into the trends of educational changes in order to identify the problems and prospects of creating an effective educational environment will ensure the quality of education and the needs.
References
Anderson, M. (2018). Humanization in the digital age: A critique of technophilia in education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgia State University. https://doi.org/10.57709/12049910
Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, Article 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
Arora, A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching–learning process: A study of higher education teachers. Prabandhan: Indian journal of management, 13(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825
Aru-Chabilan, H. (2020). Tiger Leap for digital turn in the Estonian education. Educational Media International, 57(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1744858
Bozkurt, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). Trends and patterns in distance education (2014–2019): A synthesis of scholarly publications and a visualization of the intellectual landscape. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5381
Castro, R. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3
Fensham-Smith, A. (2019). Becoming a home-educator in a networked world: Towards the democratisation of education alternatives?. Other Education: The Journal of Educational Alternatives, 8(1), 27–57. https://oro.open.ac.uk/69902/1/217-Article%20Text-822-4-10-20190609%20%281%29.pdf
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Jesmin, T., & Ley, T. (2020). Giving teachers a voice: A study of actual game use in the classroom. Information, 11(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010055
Koseoglu, S., Bozkurt, A., & Havemann, L. (2020). Critical questions for open educational practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1775341
Marcinkowski, T., & Reid, A. (2019). Reviews of research on the attitude–behavior relationship and their implications for future environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 25(4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1634237
Motoi, G. (2018). The role of the social class and the family in the formation of values in the context of the democratisation of education. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 5(1), 136–147. https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/jsserr/v5y2018i1p136-147.html
Naidu, S. (2019). Forty years of pushing the boundaries of education. Distance Education, 40(4), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1693952
Partelow, L., Brown, C., Shapiro, S., & Johnson, S. (March 28, 2018). 7 great education policy ideas for progressives in 2018. Center for American Progress. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/2018/03/27134210/7eduPolicyIdeas-brief-2.pdf
Robinson, H., Al-Freih, M., & Kilgore, W. (2020). Designing with care: Towards a care-centered model for online learning design. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-10-2019-0098
Sarv, E. S. (2020). Estonian school culture-endeavor for learning organisation at the beginning of 21st Century. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 20(14). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v20i14.3860
Shih, Y. H. (2018). Towards a pedagogy of humanizing child education in terms of teacher-student interaction. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 197–202. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1174450
Tirri, K., Eisenschmidt, E., Poom-Valickis, K., & Kuusisto, E. (2021). Current challenges in school leadership in Estonia and Finland: A multiple-case study among exemplary principals. Education Research International, 2021, Article 8855927. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8855927
Tsiplakides, I. (2018). Differentiation in higher education: The impact of parental education. Social Sciences, 7(2), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020028
Xiao, J. (2018). On the margins or at the center? Distance education in higher education. Distance Education, 39(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1429213
Yadegaridehkordi, E., Noor, N. F. B. M., Ayub, M. N. B., Affal, H. B., & Hussin, N. B. (2019). Affective computing in education: A systematic review and future research. Computers & Education, 142, Article 103649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103649
Yang, K., Liu, X., & Chen, G. (2020). Global research trends in robot education in 2009-2019: A bibliometric análisis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(6), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.6.1410
Zawacki-Richter, O., Conrad, D., Bozkurt, A., Aydin, C. H., Bedenlier, S., Jung, I., … Xiao, J. (2020). Elements of open education: An invitation to future research, 319–334. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4659
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in Computers & Education. Computers & Education, 122, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
