T-P-C Framework: Paraprofessional- Teacher Collaboration in Inclusive Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2026.06.03

Keywords:

Inclusive Education, paraprofessionals, teacher collaboration, special education

Abstract

Inclusive education has increasingly positioned students with disabilities in general education classrooms, making collaboration between general education teachers and paraprofessionals a critical component of effective instructional practice. Despite their essential role in supporting both academic and behavioural outcomes, paraprofessionals often experience limited structured collaboration, unclear role expectations, and inconsistent access to professional support. This study examined collaborative practices between paraprofessionals and general education teachers in K–12 inclusive classrooms and identified key factors that contribute to effective partnerships. A phenomenological qualitative research design was used to explore the lived experiences of paraprofessionals. Twelve participants from two school districts in South San Francisco, California, were selected through purposive sampling to provide in-depth perspectives on collaborative practices. Data were collected through structured interviews with open-ended questions and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Findings revealed that effective collaboration is characterised by consistent communication, shared instructional planning, and team-based approaches to supporting students. Participants emphasised that strong professional relationships are built on trust, mutual respect, and shared responsibility, which are essential for implementing accommodations, managing student behaviour, and delivering targeted instructional support. The result of the Teacher-Paraprofessional Collaboration Framework (TPC) highlights the importance of role clarity, shared goals, and structured communication in fostering effective teamwork. Collaboration also included reviewing Individualised Education Programs (IEPs), adapting instructional strategies, and providing individualised or small-group support. However, challenges such as limited planning time, inconsistent communication structures, and unclear role expectations were reported. The study concludes that strengthening collaboration through TPCF principles enhances inclusive practices and improves student outcomes. Establishing clear communication systems, defining roles, and providing ongoing professional development are essential for effective collaboration.

References

Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Introduction to research methodology. Springer Nature Link, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97393-2_1

Astudillo, L., Simón Rueda, C., & Blázquez, M. (2025). Current roles of support teachers: Analysis of their contribution to inclusive schools: A narrative review. Disabilities, 5(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities5010023

Barnes, M., Lafferty, K., & Li, B. (2022). Assessing twenty-first century competencies: Can students lead and facilitate the co-construction process? Educational Review, 76(4), 691–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2142524

Barnes, T. N., Cipriano, C., & Xia, Y. (2021). Cultivating effective teacher–paraprofessional collaboration in the self-contained classroom. Beyond Behavior, 30(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742956211021858

BeGell, T. M. (2024). An exploration of the training and supervision of special education paraprofessionals working in K-6 special education settings using a phenomenological design (Doctoral dissertation, National University).

Bevan, M. T. (2014). A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313519710

Bronstein, B., Reddy, L. A., Glover, T. A., & Dudek, C. M. (2021). Paraprofessional and teacher relationships in working with students with or at risk of disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669211049442

Bruce, E. J. K. (2025). Providing effective support for paraeducators working with students requiring intensive intervention. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (DRUM). https://doi.org/10.13016/wuqc-bkxr

Bush, E. J., Singh, R. L., & Kooienga, S. (2019). Lived experiences of a community: Merging interpretive phenomenology and community-based participatory research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919875891

Cole-Lade, G. M., & Bailey, L. E. (2019). Examining the role of paraeducators when supporting children with complex communication needs: A multiple case study. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419852778

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gilson, C. B., & Biggs, E. E. (2023). Perspectives of special education teachers and paraprofessionals on working together in general education settings. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(14), 3341–3356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2216206

Huri, S. A., Pradeep Sahae, J., Mary Prince, A., & Srivastava, R. (2024). Collaborative learning communities: Enhancing student engagement and academic achievement. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 3(5). https://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/3624

Kennedy, M. J. (2021). Supporting students with disabilities with positive behavioral interventions and supports in the classroom: Lessons learned from research and practice. Beyond Behavior, 30(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742956211021801

Ladenstein, J., Breyer, C. L., & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2022). Exploring changes in collaboration through the professionalisation of learning and support assistants: A mixed methods study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 38(3), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2022.2107682

Low, S., & Van Ryzin, M. J. (2024). Student-centered instruction can build social–emotional skills and peer relations: Findings from a cluster-randomized trial of technology-supported cooperative learning. School Psychology, 39(6), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000589

Mason, R. A., Gunersel, A. B., Irvin, D. W., Wills, H. P., Gregori, E., An, Z. G., & Ingram, P. B. (2020). From the frontlines: Perceptions of paraprofessionals' roles and responsibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419896627

McCarty, T. V., & Light, J. C. (2021). Supporting peer interactions for students with complex communication needs in inclusive settings: Paraeducator roles. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 7(1), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_persp-21-00141

Meyer, K., Sears, S., Putnam, R. D., & Lane, K. L. (2021). Supporting students with disabilities with positive behavioral interventions and supports in the classroom: Lessons learned from research and practice. Beyond Behavior, 30(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742956211021801

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1996-97117-000

National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Students with disabilities: Condition of education. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cgg/students-with-disabilities

Paju, B., Kajamaa, A., Pirttimaa, R., & Kontu, E. (2021). Collaboration for inclusive practices: Teaching staff perspectives from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(3), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869087

Sobeck, E. E., & Robertson, R. (2024). Tips for improving paraeducator implementation of behavior intervention plans. Teaching Exceptional Children, 57(4), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599241231212

Turner, E. L., & Mansouri, M. C. (2022). Tips for special education teachers to create effective partnerships with paraprofessionals. Inclusive Practices, 1(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745221074411

Ufermann, L., Domsch, H., & Urton, K. (2024). Perspectives of learning and support assistants on cooperation with teachers in inclusive education: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 40(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2024.2445407

Urbani, J. M., LePage, P., & Watson-Alvarado, S. (2024). Building and sustaining a collaborative educational team: Teachers and paraprofessionals. Teaching Exceptional Children, 57(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599241231215

Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315421056

Yates, P. A., Chopra, R. V., & Likins, M. (2024). Teacher-paraeducator teams: Strategies and systems to improve student outcomes through the art of collaboration. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 34(3), 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2024.2393851

Yates, P. A., Chopra, R. V., Sobeck, E. E., Douglas, S. N., Morano, S., Walker, V. L., & Schulze, R. (2020). Working with paraeducators: Tools and strategies for planning, performance feedback, and evaluation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451220910740

Zhang, Y., Zheng, T., & Liu, C. (2025). Academic engagement of autistic students in inclusive classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2025.2585905

Downloads

Published

2026-05-09

How to Cite

Roa, M. J., & Villaver Jr., M. (2026). T-P-C Framework: Paraprofessional- Teacher Collaboration in Inclusive Education. Futurity Education, 6(2), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2026.06.03