Toward a postclassical paradigm for the education of the future

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.20

Keywords:

education, post-classical education, classical education, trends, personality, development

Abstract

The authors of the article analyze the implementation of post-classical education at the present stage of society development and forecast its future. The researchers define the concept of classical and post-classical education, highlight the factors of a crisis situation in the educational environment, highlight the demands of modernity on human skills and competences. The main legacy of the study is to offer solutions to crisis situations and predict the future based on the fall environment as an institution and as a set of techniques, methodologies, and learning principles (e.g., STEAM education, flipped classroom, electronic portfolio, active work in pairs or group, preparation of presentations, the involvement of technology in learning, etc.). The authors of this study used the following methods: comparative-historical, systematic and inductive. The future of education lies in the constant rethinking of being and transformation under the demands of the twentieth century. But for now, the future is in the vein of “freedom and dignity of the child”. This work is theoretical, but its insights are useful for state structures in education and educational institutions to recall and give impetus to greater implementation of the newest systems and methods of education, so that the next generations no longer face severe crises, have quick adaptation, and be modern people.

References

Adamczak, A. (2021). Edukacja humanistyczna dla społeczeństwa obywatelskiego [Humanistic education for a civil society]. In R. Kania & M. Kazimierczuk (Eds.), Społeczeństwo obywatelskie : Historia, teoria, praktyka [Civil society: History, theory, practice] (pp. 224–239). Difin. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/270749

Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847

Care, E., & Kim, H. (2018). Assessment of 21st-century skills: The issue of authenticity. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Research and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_2

Chawrilska, I. (2019). Transmedialność jako transkulturowe doświadczenie ucznia [Transmediality as a transcultural student experience]. Postscriptum Polonistyczne, 2(24), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.31261/ps_p.2019.24.14

Egger, A. E., Kastens, K. A., & Turrin, M. K. (2017). Sustainability, the next generation science standards, and the education of future teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-174.1

Fayolle, A. (2018). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. In A research agenda for entrepreneurship education (pp. 127–138). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432919.00013

Gajek, A., Fabiano, B., Laurent, A., & Jensen, D. (2022). Process safety education of future employee 4.0 in Industry 4.0. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 75, Article 104691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104691

Hajar Halili, S. (2019). Technological advancements in Education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 7(1), 63–69. https://tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/volumes/tojdel-volume07-i01.pdf#page=70

Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2020). Education 4.0: Defining the teacher, the student, and the school manager aspects of the revolution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 12–28. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770896

Holfelder, A. K. (2019). Towards a sustainable future with education?. Sustainability Science, 14, 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00682-z

Kwieciński, Z. (2019). Grzęzawisko: Eseje z pedagogiki społecznej i krytycznej socjologii edukacji [Quagmire: Essays on social pedagogy and critical sociology of education]. Studio Kropka dtp-Piotr Kabaciński.

Lis, E. (2021). Program kształcenia ogólnego Marthy C. Nussbaum jako remedium na „cichy kryzys” edukacji [Martha C. Nussbaum's general education program as a remedy for the „quiet crisis” of education]. Edukacja Dorosłych, 85(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.12775/ed.2021.018

Mielkov, I. (2020). Higher education under the conditions of complexity and uncertainty of the world: Post-non-classical development strategies and personal dimension. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 9, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2020-9-1-62-77

Mikiewicz, P. (2022). Edukacjonalizacja i jej znaczenie we współczesnym świecie [Educationalisation and its meaning in contemporary world]. Youth in Central and Eastern Europe, 8(12), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.24917/ycee.2021.12.43-51

Pllana, D. (2019). Creativity in modern education. World Journal of Education, 9(2), 136–140. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1215357

Szmyd, J. (2021). Edukacja w kryzysie. Próba wstępnej charakterystyki i oceny [The education in crisis. The initial description and assessment of the phenomenon]. Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 43(1), 7–26. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1126674

Veljković, A., Stanković, S., Golubović-Ilić, I., & Herodek, K. (2020). The differences in students’ attitudes about online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic. Pedagogy, 92(7s), 205–210. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=901708

Webb, D. (2018). Bolt-holes and breathing spaces in the system: On forms of academic resistance (or, can the university be a site of utopian possibility?). The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 40(2), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2018.1442081

Wong, T., Moulds, P., Browning, P., Dean, W., & Priest, D. (2017). The future of education. Independence, 42(1), 4–19. Retrieved from: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.215722

Wrońska, K. (2019). Sens i wymiary edukacji w pedagogice klasycznego liberalizmu [The meaning and the extent of education in the educational theory of classical liberalism]. In J. Kostkiewicz & S. Opozda-Suder (Eds.), Pedagogika, niepełnosprawność, edukacja : ku szerokim przestrzeniom rozwoju pedagogiki specjalnej : księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Franciszkowi Wojciechowskiemu z okazji siedemdziesiątych urodzin [Pedagogy, disability, education : Towards the broad fields of the development of special pedagogy : The jubilee book dedicated to Professor Franciszek Wojciechowski on the occasion seventieth birthday] (pp. 47–57). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Zhang, K., & Begum Aslan, A. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025

Downloads

Published

2022-03-25

How to Cite

Sanetra, B., & Małodobry, Z. (2022). Toward a postclassical paradigm for the education of the future. Futurity Education, 2(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.20