Digital Competence of Higher Education Applicants: New Opportunities and Challenges for Future Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.23

Keywords:

digital literacy, students, situation, features of formation

Abstract

As a result of the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic and the introduction of distance learning, the issue of digital competence, which both modern educators and students should possess, has become especially relevant. Digital competence is important in the education system, because having it, students can adequately respond to modern global challenges and transformations. The study aims to analyze the state of digital competence of higher education applicants through the prism of modern challenges and opportunities. The work is based on the use of general theoretical and empirical research methods. Analysis, synthesis, abstraction, and concretization were important among theoretical methods. Based on the predictive method of research the main ways of digital competence formation and specifics of future use were characterized. At the same time, to determine the level of digital competence, a questionnaire and survey of students based on digital literacy diagnostic techniques were conducted. The results considered the problem of theoretical justification of the digital competence phenomenon, offered their own understanding of this term, determined the structure of formation of basic competencies in higher education applicants, based on the use of modern techniques, characterized the state of digital literacy of students. The results also indicate that mostly the respondents of the experiment had an average level of digital competence. Despite this, many respondents were not fully acquainted with the manipulative possibilities of information resources. The practical value of the work lies in the development of practical recommendations that can be applied in further work to improve the level of mastery of digital competence.

References

Amez, S., & Baert, S. (2020). Smartphone use and academic performance: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Article 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101618

Anghel, E., Ludlow, L., Szendey, O., Matz-Costa, C., O’Keefe, T., & Braun, H. (2021). Measuring purpose in life in college students: An assessment of invariance properties by college year and undergraduate school. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.4.603

Araújo, M. I. O., & Bizzo, N. (2015). Processo investigativo sobre práticas pedagógicas para inserção da dimensão ambiental na formação de professores de Biologia [Investigative process on educational practices to integration in environmental dimension biology teacher training]. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 8(16), 125–138. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8640713

Ben-Amram, M., & Davidovitch, N. (2021). School and home as study spaces: Attitudes of teachers, parents, and students to e-learning during the covid-19 period: The case of Israel. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(4), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.4.715

Bigirwa, J. P. (2020). On-line quality management a precursor for improving e-learning adoption in midwifery schools in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.271

Boyle, T., Petriwskyj, A., Grieshaber, S., & Jones, L. (2021). Coaching practices: Building teacher capability to enhance continuity in the early years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, Article 103515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103515

Bowen, N. E. J. A., Satienchayakorn, N., Teedaaksornsakul, M., & Thomas, N. (2021). Legitimising teacher identity: Investment and agency from an ecological perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, Article 103519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103519

Braun, H. (2021). Data in the educational and social sciences: It’s time for some respect. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.3.447

Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2021). How does self- regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, Article 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100805

Kem, D. (2022). Personalised and adaptive learning: Emerging learning platforms in the era of digital and smart learning. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(2), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-02

Kirshner, J. (2021). COVID-19 as a crucible: The transformation of global educators. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.4.557

Kramer, C., König, J., Strauß, S., & Kaspar, K. (2020). Classroom videos or transcripts? A quasi-experimental study to assess the effects of media-based learning on pre-service teachers’ situation-specific skills of classroom management. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Article 101624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101624

Krasniakova, A. (2019). Tsyfrova kompetentnist korystuvachiv Internetu: Sotsialno- ta politykopsykholohichni aspekty doslidzhennia [Digital competence of internet users: Social, political and psychological case study aspects). Problems of Political Psychology), 8(22), 198–210.

McGrew, S. (2021). Challenging approaches: Sharing and responding to weak digital heuristics in class discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, Article 103512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103512

Papakitsa, O. (2012). Informatsiina hotovnist maibutnikh inzheneriv do profesiinoi diialnosti: zmist i psykholohichni osoblyvosti formuvannia [Information readiness of future engineers toprofessional activity: content and psychological features of formation]. Bulletin of the Kharkiv National University, 50, 156–159.

Renigere, R., & Cela, E. (2019). Ecological competence of health care. Journal of Education, Teaching and Social Studies, 1(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.22158/jetss.v1n2p105

Sagre, A., Herazo Rivera, J. D., Montes, P. G., Posada, T. B., Machado, L. P., & González Humanez, L. E. (2021). Contradictions and critical praxis in foreign language teachers’ implementation of reading to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, Article 103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103516

Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Investigating prompts for supporting students' self-regulation – A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches?. The Internet and Higher Education, 49, Article 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791

Downloads

Published

2022-03-25

How to Cite

Saienko, V., Kurysh, N., & Siliutina, I. (2022). Digital Competence of Higher Education Applicants: New Opportunities and Challenges for Future Education. Futurity Education, 2(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.23