Forecasting the Prospects for Innovative Changes in the Development of Future linguistic Education for the XXI Century: The Choice of Optimal Strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.25.12.0.4

Keywords:

paradigm shift, postmodern pedagogy, educational opportunities, educational strategies

Abstract

The paper analyzes orientations and research tools in the field of linguistics, namely the development of linguistic education, general themes and strategies, specific scientific orientations, as well as some aspects of the institutional structure where it develops. The perspective of the topics analyzes the general strategies that have already been defined by scientific thought or are still in their developmental stage and proposes their own strategies for foreign language learning. The transition to an information society has caused a paradigm shift in the gravity and role of language knowledge in society. With the regard to educational knowledge, the paradigm change can be summarized as follows: there has been a transition from the educational model characteristic of modern pedagogy to the educational model of postmodern pedagogy, which involves mainly quality learning, through a comprehensive approach, integrating the learning content at the project level of a certain learning type to achieve the ideal of learning and universal development of a holistic person. This paradigm shift is associated with the affirmation of the triad of the learning educational model: lifelong learning, self- education, and full use of educational opportunities. The paper emphasizes the importance of foreign language learning strategies in the aspect of foreign language learning and teaching. One summarizes that the context of strategies and concepts of foreign language learning describe the taxonomy of innovative strategies, consider the role of the teacher in learning and development of future linguistic education.

References

Ahmadi-Azad, S., Asadollahfam, H., & Zoghi, M. (2020). Effects of teacher’s personality traits on EFL learners’ foreign language enjoyment. System, 95, Article 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102369

Albury, N. (2020). 18 Language attitudes and ideologies on linguistic diversity. In A. C. Schalley & S. A. Eisenchlas (Eds.), Handbook of Home Language Maintenance and Development (pp. 357–376). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510175

Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019). Adding communicative and affective strategies to an embodied conversational agent to enhance second language learners’ willingness to communicate. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6

Chen, S. Y., Lai, C. F., Lai, Y. H., & Su, Y. S. (2022). Effect of project-based learning on development of students’ creative thinking. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, 59(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720919846808

Doghonadze, N., Aliyev, A., Halawachy, H., Knodel, L., & Adedoyin, A. S. (2020). The degree of readiness to total distance learning in the face of COVID-19-teachers’ view (Case of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iraq, Nigeria, UK and Ukraine). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3904094

Feng, Y., Iriarte, F., & Valencia, J. (2020). Relationship between learning styles, learning strategies and academic performance of Chinese students who learn Spanish as a foreign language. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(5), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00496-8

Gross, B. (2019). Further language learning in linguistic and cultural diverse contexts: A mixed methods research in a European Border Region. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021787

Imanova, S. (2021). Promoting Azerbaijani students’ intercultural competence through distance education of foreign languages. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12(3), 232–241. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no3.16

Isaqjon, T. (2022). Strategies and techniques for improving EFL learners’ reading skills. Involta Scientific Journal, 1(11), 94–99. https://involta.uz/index.php/iv/article/view/348

Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.242

Lugosi, E., & Uribe, G. (2022). Active learning strategies with positive effects on students’ achievements in undergraduate mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1773555

Martins, R. M., & Gresse Von Wangenheim, C. (2022). Findings on teaching machine learning in high school: A ten-year systematic literature review. Informatics in Education, 22(3), 421–440.https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.18

Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Matthews, R. (2022). Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3171–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1

Moskvitcheva, S., & Abdullaev, R. (2021). Vectors and key factors of the dynamics of languages in the secondary education system in the Republic of Azerbaijan in 1990–2020. IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 6(18), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.819371

Poorebrahim, F., Sattarpour, S., & Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). Written text quality and socio-affective strategy use: Monolinguals versus bilinguals across different proficiency levels. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(4), 1119–1134. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.4.1119

Qin, L. T., & Zhang, J. L. (2019). English as a foreign language writers’ metacognitive strategy knowledge of writing and their writing performance in multimedia environments. Journal of Writing Research 12(2), 394–413 http://hdl.handle.net/2292/48890

Sethuraman, M., & Radhakrishnan, G. (2020). Promoting cognitive strategies in second language writing. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 88, 105–120. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1263625

Shukla, A. (2019). Autonomy in language learning and teaching. Integrated Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 12–14. http://www.pubs.iscience.in/journal/index.php/ijss/article/view/880

Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4

Vargas-Hernández, J. G., & Vargas-González, O. C. (2022). Strategies for meaningful learning in higher education. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.41

Downloads

Published

2022-12-25

How to Cite

Jalilbayli, O. B. (2022). Forecasting the Prospects for Innovative Changes in the Development of Future linguistic Education for the XXI Century: The Choice of Optimal Strategies. Futurity Education, 2(4), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2022.25.12.0.4