Modern Tools for Distance Education: Information and Analytical Prospectus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.06.25.15Keywords:
distance education, distance education tools, social constructivism, interaction, engagement, decision-making, problem-solvingAbstract
The article explores modern tools used in distance education, with the goal of reviewing their benefits and limitations. Relevant definitions of distance education are first discussed in the paper and after, the key provisions of the social constructivism theory in the context of education are presented. Various types of distance education tools, including communication, learning management, content creation, assessment, and artificial intelligence tools are identified in the article, and appropriate provisions of the social constructivism theory that allow for the implementation of these tools are explained. Using the theory of social constructivism as a basis, the article analyses modern distance education tools based on various parameters, including interactivity with peers, interactivity with teachers, engagement, problem-solving, and decision-making. In the article the advantages and disadvantages of using these tools are also examined, their potential to enhance communication, collaboration, and personalised learning, while also acknowledging challenges such as a lack of social interaction, technical difficulties, and pedagogical issues are highlighted. Overall, the article emphasises the need for careful design and regulation to reduce risks and overcome limitations, making distance education a valuable option for both learners and institutions. Teachers and students should work together in order to manage these challenges and take advantage of the benefits provided by these modern tools.
References
Bandeira, F. & Cardoso, J. C. (2021). Quality practices in higher education distance learning: The perspective of practitioners. In A. Moura, P. Reis, & M. Cordeiro (Eds.), Handbook of research on determining the reliability of online assessment and distance learning (pp. 1–23). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4769-4.ch001
Barfi, K. A., Arkorful, V., Appiah, F., Agyapong, E. M., & Acheampong, E. (2023). The impact of blended learning on students using the IBOX platform: Initial perspectives of teachers. Heliyon, 9(3), Article e14297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14297
Berge, Z. L. (2018). Mobile learning and distance education. In M. G. Moore & C. D. William (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th Edition) (pp. 207–213). Routledge.
Bhise, A., Munshi, A., Rodrigues, A., & Sawant, V. (2022). Overview of AI in education. In P. P. Churi, S. Joshi, M. Elhoseny, & A. Omrane (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in higher education: A practical approach (pp. 31–62). CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003184157-2/overview-ai-education-archana-bhise-ami-munshi-anjana-rodrigues-vidya-sawant
Brown, L. (2014). Constructivist learning environments and defining the online learning community. Journal on School Educational Technology, 9(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.4.2704
Cleveland-Innes, M. F., & Garrison, D. R. (Eds.). (2020). An introduction to distance education: Understanding teaching and learning in a New Era (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166896
Goksel, N. & Karadeniz, A. (2022). Promises and pitfalls of open and distance learning: Course design during the corona lockdown. In G. Durak & S. Çankaya (Eds.), Handbook of research on managing and designing online courses in synchronous and asynchronous environments (pp. 233–250). IGI Global. https://www.irma-international.org/viewtitle/292367/?isxn=9781799887010
Grooms, L. D. (2000). Interaction in the computer-mediated adult distance learning environment: Leadership development through online education [Doctoral dissertation]. Regent University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/2e678afcdb80923090f398540b5ba33a/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Grynyuk, S., Kovtun, O., Sultanova, L., Zheludenko, M., Zasluzhena, A., & Zaytseva, I. (2022). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of Ukraine’s higher education system. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2198
Hurajova, A., Kollarova, D., & Huraj, L. (2022). Trends in education during the pandemic: modern online technologies as a tool for the sustainability of university education in the field of media and communication studies. Heliyon, 8(5), Article e09367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09367
Hussein, E., Daoud, S., Alrabaiah, H., & Badawi, R. (2020). Exploring undergraduate students’ attitudes towards emergency online learning during COVID-19: A case from the UAE. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, Article 105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105699
Jameel, T., Ali, R., & Toheed, I. (2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence: Research challenges and potential solutions. In 2020 3rd international conference on computing, mathematics and engineering technologies (iCoMET). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icomet48670.2020.9073911
Long, H. B. (1983). Adult learning: Research and practice. Cambridge.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Moore, M. G. (2018). Preface. In M. G. Moore & W.C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education. (pp. xi- xviii). Routledge.
Poláková, P., & Klímová, B. (2021). The perception of Slovak students on distance online learning in the time of Coronavirus — A preliminary study. Education Sciences, 11(2), Article 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020081
Radovan, M. & Makovec, D. (2022). This is not (the new) normal. Students’ attitudes towards studying during the COVID-19 pandemic and the determinants of academic overload. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2366
Sarsar, F., Kişla, T., Karasu, M., Arıkan, Y. D., & Kılıç, M. (2020). The usability of mobile devices in distance learning. In G. Durak & S. Çankaya (Eds.), Managing and designing online courses in ubiquitous learning environments (pp. 262–278). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9779- 7.ch014
Sayaf, A. M. (2023). Adoption of E-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education. Heliyon, 9(2), Article e13014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13014
Sethi, K., Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, V. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in higher education: First attempt. In S. Verma & P. Tomar (Eds.), Impact of AI technologies on teaching, learning, and research in higher education (pp. 1-29). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4763-2.ch001
Shen, L., Chen, I., Grey, A., & Su, A. (2021). Teaching and learning with Artificial Intelligence. In S. Verma & P. Tomar (Eds.), Impact of AI technologies on teaching, learning, and research in higher education (pp. 73–98). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4763-2.ch005
Shih, M., Li, G.-Y., & Chang, W.-S. (2021). Keeping things normal during an uncommon time: A lesson from National Taiwan University. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(1). https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/jotlt/article/view/31470
Taner, A., Akyıldız, S., Gülay, A., & Özdemir, C. (2021). Investigating education faculty students’ views about asynchronous distance education practices during Covid-19 isolation period. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(1), 34–45. https://perrjournal.com/index.php/perrjournal/article/view/90
Thompson, M. M. (2018). The ethical character of distance education. In M. G. Moore & W.C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (4th Edition) (pp. 189–206). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315296135-16/ethical-character-distance-education-melody-thompson
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
