Track Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Understanding of Special Quadrilaterals: An Exploration of Level 3 of Geometric Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.09.25.02Keywords:
Definitions Understanding, Egyptian Education, Geometry Education, Quadrilaterals, Van Hiele TheoryAbstract
Acknowledging the value of understanding defining and classifying special quadrilaterals for prospective mathematics teachers (PMTs), the present study attempts to track this understanding so that the progress of thinking from Van Hiele's level 2 to level 3 could be theorised. Thus, a bounded case study sample of PMTs, who had graduated and joined the mathematics teacher preparation diploma at the Faculty of Education, Tanta University in Egypt, were selected and requested to (a) define trapezoid, parallelogram, rhombus, rectangle, and square, and (b) represent the relationship among these quadrilaterals. The data were collected and analysed in two cycles. During the first cycle, participants' responses were scrutinised upon Prototype 1; it was developed based on the literature review to describe levels of special quadrilaterals understanding as faulty, partitional-uneconomical, partitional-economical, hierarchical-uneconomical, and hierarchical economical. Similarly, the researchers replicated the same analytical process in the second cycle in order to validate the levels suggested in Prototype 1. Also, some clinical interviews were conducted to confirm the participants’ representations of relationships among the defined quadrilaterals. The results enabled advancing the hypothetical Prototype 1 to Prototype 2. Prototype 2 reconceptualised the levels of understanding into faulty, slightly economical, fairly economical, and economical, wherein each level was determined based on (a) the economics of the concept definition and (b) the awareness of relationships among other related definitions to the concept defined (recognising subsets and supersets). These results are prospective for further investigations to sufficiently unpack all sub-levels of geometric thinking embedded in Van Hiele’s fixed levels. It also provides basics on proper pedagogical approaches and corresponding interventions to train PMTs effectively teach geometric thinking.
References
Alhannan, O. M. M. (2019). A proposed strategy based on successful intelligence theory for teaching geometry in enhancing spatial ability and evaluative thinking skills of prep stage first graders [استراتيجية مقترحة قائمة على نظرية الذكاء الناجح لتدريس الهندسة في تنمية القدرة المكانية ومهارات التفكير التقويمي لدى تلاميذ الصف الأول الإعدادي]. Mathematics Education Journal, 22(10), 6–63. https://doi.org/10.21608/armin.2019.81260
Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2017). Interactions between defining, explaining and classifying: The case of increasing and decreasing sequences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9709-4
Almaraghy, E. E. S. (2020). Using the Mantle of Expert strategy in teaching engineering in an integrated manner to enhance achievement and reduce the degree and causes of mental wandering among primary school students [استخدام استراتيجية عباءة الخبير في تدريس الهندسة بأسلوب تكاملي على التحصيل وخفض درجة التجول العقلي والحد من أسبابه لدى تلاميذ المرحلة الابتدائية]. Mathematics Education Journal, 23(1), 31-79. https://doi.org/10.21608/armin.2020.80893
Avcu, R. (2022). Pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ personal concept definitions of special quadrilaterals. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00412-2
Bell, G., & Woo, J. H. (1998). Probing the links between language and mathematical conceptualization. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217122
Bharaj, P. K., & Francis, D. C. (2020). “A square is not long enough to be a rectangle”: Exploring prospective elementary teachers’ conceptions of quadrilaterals. In A.I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés-Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz-Arias (Eds.), Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 727–728). PME-NA https://doi.org/10.51272/pmena.42.2020-106
Brousseau, G. (2006). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970–1990 (Vol. 19). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
Bütüner, S. Ö., & Filiz, M. (2017). Exploring Turkish mathematics teachers’ content knowledge of quadrilaterals. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 395–408. https://ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/186
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. In J. W. Creswell (Ed.), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (pp. 53–84). Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Çontay, E. G., & Paksu, A. D. (2012). Preservice mathematics teachers’ understandings of the class inclusion between kite and square. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 782–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.564
De Villiers, M. (1986). The role of the axiomatization in mathematics and mathematics teaching. Stellenbosch, RSA: Research Unit for Mathematics Education, University of Stellenbosch.
De Villiers, M. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248098
De Villiers, M. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define? In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 248–255). Stellenbosch, RSA: University of Stellenbosch.
Duatepe-Paksu, A., Pakmaka, G. S., & Iymen, E. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers’ identification of necessary and sufficient conditions for a rhombus. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3294–3253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.045
Erdogan, E. O., & Dur, Z. (2014). Preservice mathematics teachers’ personal figural concepts and classifications about quadrilaterals. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), Article 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.1
Ekramay, M. M. (2020). Using co-operative inquiry based on technology in teaching geometrical content to develop spatial sense, and geometrical understanding [استخدام الاستقصاء التعاوني المتمركز حول التكنولوجيا في تدريس محتوى الهندسة لتنمية المقدرة على الحس المكاني والفهم الهندسي ]. Mathematics Education Journal, 23(6), 223–277. https://doi.org/10.21608/armin.2020.115309
Erez, M. M., & Yerushalmy, M. (2006). “If you can turn a rectangle into a square, you can turn a square into a rectangle...” young students experience the dragging tool. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-006-9106-7
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fujita, T. (2012). Learners’ level of understanding of the inclusion relations of quadrilaterals and prototype phenomenon. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 60–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.08.003
Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2007). Learners' understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: Towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520167
Fujita, T., Doney, J., & Wegerif, R. (2019). Students’ collaborative decision-making processes in defining and classifying quadrilaterals: A semiotic dialogic approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09892-9
Güner, P., & Gülten, D. Ç. (2016). Pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ skills of using the language of mathematics in the context of quadrilaterals. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7(1), 13-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED607571.pdf
Harper, S. R., & Driskell, S. O. S. (2021). Prospective mathematics teachers’ geometric definitions and conceptions about properties of two-dimensional shapes. In D. Olanoff, K. Johnson, & S. M. Spitzer (Eds.), Productive struggle: Persevering through challenges: Proceedings of the forty-third annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education. Philadelphia, PA. http://www.pmena.org/pmenaproceedings/PMENA%2043%202021%20Proceedings.pdf
Jones, K., Mooney, C., & Harries, T. (2002). Trainee primary teachers’ knowledge of geometry for teaching. In Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 22(2), 95–100. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33327.pdf
Kabaca, T. (2017). Understanding the hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals through the ordered relation according to diagonal properties. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(8), 1240–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1334969
Kelcey, B., Hill, C. H., & Chin, J. M. (2019). Teacher mathematical knowledge, instructional quality, and student outcomes: a multilevel quantile mediation analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(4), 398–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1570944
Kuzniak, A., & Rauscher, J. C. (2007). On the geometrical thinking of pre-service school teacher. In Proceeding Cerme4, Sant Feliu de Guixols Spain.
Lutfi, M. K., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2021). Students’ ontogenic obstacle on the topic of triangle and quadrilateral. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806, Article 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012108
Miller, S. M. (2018). An analysis of the form and content of quadrilateral definitions composed by novice pre-service teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.02.006
Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S.M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: what can preservice teachers learn?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.5.0491
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Ndlovu, M. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ understanding of geometrical definitions and class inclusion: an analysis using the Van Hiele model. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), INTED2014 Proceedings (pp. 6642–6652). Valencia, Spain: International Academy of Technology, Education and Development.
Okazaki, M., & Fujita, T. (2007). Prototype phenomena and common cognitive paths in the understanding of the inclusion relations between quadrilaterals in Japan and Scotland. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 41–48). Seoul: PME.
Özdemir, A., & Çekirdekci, S. (2022). Geometric habits of mind: The meaning of quadrilaterals for elementary school student teachers. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 9(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.17278/ijesim.1033078
Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557
Ozkan, M., & Bal, A. P. (2017). Analysis of the misconceptions of 7th grade students on polygons and specific quadrilaterals. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(67), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.67.10
Pagiling, S. L., & Nur’aini, K. D. (2022). Specialized content knowledge lower secondary school teachers on quadrilaterals. PYTHAGORAS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(1), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v17i1.42446
Pickreign, J. (2007). Rectangle and rhombi: How well do pre-service teachers know them?. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ835492.pdf
Şahin, O., & Başgül, M. (2020). Pre-service primary school teachers' pedagogical content knowledge on quadrilaterals. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 13(2), 284–305. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1280407
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, development of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944
Sinclair, N., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., de Villiers, M., Jones, K., Kortenkamp, U., Leung, A., & Owens, K. (2016). Recent research on geometry education: an ICME-13 survey team report. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0796-6
Susanto, D. (2020). Problematic of definition and terminology affecting primary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567, Article 022096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022096
Syamsuddin, A. (2019). Investigating student’s geometric thinking in looking for the linkages of quadrilaterals (A case study on students in the formal operation stage). International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 14(7), 435–444. http://www.ijese.net/makale/2134.html
Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
The Egyptian Ministry of Education and Technical Education. (2020). Mathematics for first preparatory grade, first term. Book Sector.
Türnüklü, E., Gündoğdu Alaylı, F., & Akkaş, E. N. (2013). Investigation of prospective primary mathematics teachers’ perceptions and images for quadrilaterals. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1225–1232. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017328.pdf
Ulger, T. K., & Broutin, M. S. (2017). Pre-service mathematics teachers' understanding of quadrilaterals and the interval relationships between quadrilaterals: The case of parallelograms. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.331
Usiskin, Z., Griffin, J., Witonsky, D. B., & Willmore, E. (2008). The classification of quadrilaterals: A study of definition. Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2012). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Nobel Akademik Yayoncolok.
Van Dormolen, J., & Zaslavsky, O. (2003). The many facets of a definition: The case of periodicity. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00006-3
Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and Insight: A theory of mathematics education. Academic Press.
Wang, S., & Kinzel, M. (2014). How do they know it is a parallelogram? Analysing geometric discourse at van Hiele Level 3. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.933711
Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: A case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9131-7
Žilková, K. (2015). Misconceptions in pre-service primary education teachers about quadrilaterals misconceptions in pre-service primary education teachers about quadrilaterals. Journal of Education, Psychology and Social Sciences, 3(1), 30–37.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
