The Role of Learning Environments in Shaping Prospective Teachers’ Thinking Styles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.12.25.15Keywords:
learning environments, thinking styles, prospective teachersAbstract
Prospective teachers’ thinking styles might impact their attitudes and behaviors in the teaching profession. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the influence of the learning environments in teacher training programs on the thinking styles of prospective teachers. This research aimed to investigate the correlation between these two factors, using a constructivist learning environment theory and a threefold model of thinking styles as the theoretical framework. Questionnaires were administered among 1,062 year 4 prospective teachers (aged 22.74 ± .65) from a teacher training program in Chinese mainland. Demographics including gender and subject taught were controlled for. Stepwise multiple linear regressions were run and findings indicated that peer morale and constructive learning in learning environment significantly contributed to these prospective teachers’ creativity-favoring (Type I) thinking styles, whereas assignment and assessment positively predicted their norm-favoring (Type II) thinking styles. Implications for key stakeholders of teacher educations were discussed and suggestions for future studies were provided.
References
Berry, W. (2000). Understanding multivariate research: A primer for beginning social scientists. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503368
Çetin, F., Demir, E., & Bingöl, A. (2022). Investigation of prospective teachers' attitudes towards classroom as a learning environment. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1174058
Cheng, L., Wu, D., & Cao, J. (2023). Determinants of preschool teachers’ knowledge-sharing behavior from a thinking style perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), Article 13030230. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030230
Clarke, T. A., Lesh, J. J., Trocchio, J. S., & Wolman, C. (2010). Thinking styles: Teaching and learning styles in graduate education students. Educational Psychology, 30(7), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.510794
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Masui, C. (2004). The CLIA-model: A framework for designing powerful learning environments for thinking and problem solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 365–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173216
Doménech-Betoret, F., & Gómez-Artiga, A. (2014). The relationship among students' and teachers' thinking styles, psychological needs and motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 29(3), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.002
Fan, W. Q. (2012). An experimental comparison of the flexibility in the use of thinking styles in traditional and hypermedia learning environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.007
Fan, J. (2014). Thinking styles' socialization and their roles in student development [Unpublished Dissertation]. The University of Hong Kong.
Fan, J. (2020). Thinking styles: Identity, value, and malleability. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Fan, J., & Zhang, L. F. (2013). The role of learning environments in thinking styles. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817538
Göloglu Demir, C., & Çetin, F. (2022). An investigation of teacher candidates' metaphoric perceptions regarding the virtual classroom. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(3), 1328–1342. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1351914
Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Prospective mathematics teachers’ thinking styles and problem-solving skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40(2), Article 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100827
Hammad, M. A., & Awed, H. S. (2022). Thinking styles and their relationship with self-efficacy among deaf and hard-of-hearing adolescent students. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 42(11), 25880–25893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03597-8
Huang, J., & Liu, J. (2023). Learning styles identification model in a MOOC learning environment. In W. Hong & Y. Weng (Eds.), Communications in computer and information science (pp. 234–244). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2446-2_22
Juniati, D., & Budayasa, I. K. (2022). The influence of cognitive and affective factors on the performance of prospective mathematics teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1379–1391. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1379
Kuan, T.-Y. J. (2023). The mediating role of thinking styles in the relationship between adolescent time perspective and subjective well‐being. Journal of Adolescence, 95(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12130
Li, Z., & Li, B. (2021). Measuring thinking styles of pre-service and early career teachers: Validation of a revised inventory. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.3.421
Liu, Z., Yu, H., Feng, M., & Hou, Y. (2023). Thinking styles and creativity: The mediating role of psychological adjustment in college students. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), Article 13100875. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100875
Meihami, H. (2022). An exploratory investigation into EFL teacher educators’ approaches to develop EFL teachers’ ability to teach for creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, Article 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101006
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. SAGE Publications.
Muhammad, I., Shah, M., & Atta, M. (2020). Teachers thinking styles and teacher effectiveness: A comparative analysis at secondary school level. Global Regional Review, 5(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(V-II).02
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231
Saini, G., Shabnam, Seema, & Bhatnagar, V. (2022). The pattern of executive professionals’ thinking styles in relation to cognitive styles and metacognition skills. Cogent Psychology, 9(1), Article 2068741. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2022.2068741
Santiago, R., & Nakayama, M. (2006). Understanding E-Learners' characteristics and performance in online courses. In R. Mizoguchi, P. Dillenbourg, & Z. Zhu (Eds.), Learning by effective utilization of technologies: Facilitating intercultural understanding (pp. 521–524). IOS Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in school. European Journal of High Ability, 6(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445940060211
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style?. American Psychologist, 52(7), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2007). Thinking Styles Inventory - Revised II [Unpublished test].
Tekin-Sitrava, R., Kaiser, G., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2022). Development of prospective teachers’ noticing skills within initial teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1611–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10211-z
The Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). Implementation of public-funded education in normal universities directly under the MOE. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-08/10/content_5313008.htm
Wang, D., & Gao, M. (2013). Educational equality or social mobility: The value conflict between preservice teachers and the Free Teacher Education Program in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32(3), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.008
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003251770
Xenofontos, C., & Hizli Alkan, S. (2022). Prospective primary teachers’ professional noticing in non-formal learning environments: The case of a mathematics fair. Education Sciences, 12(1), Article 12010055. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010055
Yu, T.-m., & Chen, C. (2012). Thinking styles and preferred teacher interpersonal behavior among Hong Kong students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 554–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.02.002
Zhang, L. F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 1295–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.015
Zhang, L. F. (2013). The malleability of intellectual styles. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, L. F. (2015). Fostering successful intellectual styles for creativity. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9378-5
Zhang, L. F., & He, Y. (2003). Do thinking styles matter in the use of and attitudes toward computing and information technology among Hong Kong university students? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(4), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.2190/3M8D-1D56-V60C-BHR5
Zhang, L. F., Postiglione, G. A., & Jiao, B. (2012). Thinking styles, culture, and economy: Comparing Tibetan minority students with Han Chinese majority students. In W. R. Allen, R. T. Teranishi, & M. Bonous-Hammarth (Eds.), As the world turns: Implications of global shifts in higher education for theory, research and practice (Advances in education in diverse communities, Volume 7) (pp. 239-260). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-005-1635-4
Zhou, H. (2010). Analysis and policy adjustment on the contradiction of free of charge in normal education in practice. Educational Research, 8, 58–61.
Zhu, C. (2013). Students’ and teachers’ thinking styles and preferred teacher interpersonal behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.736431
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
