The Future Pedagogical Landscape: The Impact of Augmented Reality on the Development of Education and Teaching Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.12.25.16Keywords:
augmented reality, technology, efficiency, surveys, terms of useAbstract
Modern digitization processess allow the use of augmented reality technology for pedagogical purposes. The practice of this tool, given its novelty, will require additional reasoning. The purpose was to study the future pedagogical landscape through the prism of the use of augmented reality. Methods: a mixed research design was used, attracting 50 teachers of different educational institutions who agreed to participate in the discussion. The sample provided a diversity according to various parameters: age, years of teaching experience, teaching of academic disciplines. The inclusion criteria: current teaching faculty with experience using digital and augmented reality technologies. Data collection was carried out during the first semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. The use of mixed research methods, analysis of collected data, and the identification of the main factors that influenced the successful implementation of these technologies into the educational process, made a unique contribution to this issue understanding. The results confirmed that the use of augmented reality technologies had numerous advantages in the educational process. They created an interactive environment, attracting students' attention and making learning interesting. The findings of the questionnaire of pedagogical staff testified to the widespread use of these technologies, with 40% of teachers who continuously used them, and 30% who used them 2-3 times a week. The obtained data analysis indicated the positive perception of augmented reality in the educational process and a high level of teacher satisfaction from their use. The positive feedback from educators regarding the effective integration of AR suggests a potential shift in teaching paradigms. This implication underscores the need for ongoing research to delve deeper into the long-term impact of AR on student learning. The exploration of the scalability of AR implementations across diverse educational settings and subjects for future studies, could provide valuable insights into its broader applicability.
References
Almås, A. G., Bueie, A. A., & Aagaard, T. (2021). From digital competence to professional digital competence. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4233
Andersone, R. (2020). Innovations in the improved curriculum content of the competence approach: A case study in Latvia. Rural Environment. Education. Personality (REEP), 13, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.22616/reep.2020.025
Antonioli, M., Blake, C., & Sparks, K. (2014). Augmented reality applications in education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 40(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v40i2.a.4
Atanasyan, A., Kobelt, D., Goppold, M., Cichon, T., & Schluse, M. (2020). The FeDiNAR project: Using augmented reality to turn mistakes into learning opportunities. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 71–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_5
But, V., & Panchenko, G. (2016). Implementation modern forms of lifelong learning in Ukraine. Continuing Professional Education: Theory and Practice, (3–4), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.28925/1609-8595.2016(3-4)122126
Campisi, C. A., Li, E. H., Jimenez, D. E., & Milanaik, R. L. (2020). Augmented reality in medical education and training: From physicians to patients. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 111–138). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_7
Cobo, C., & Rivas, A. (2023). The new digital education policy landscape: From education systems to platforms. Taylor & Francis.
Daling, L., Kommetter, C., Abdelrazeq, A., Ebner, M., & Ebner, M. (2020). Mixed reality books: Applying augmented and virtual reality in mining engineering education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 185–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_10
Ducasse, J. (2020). Augmented reality for outdoor environmental education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 329–352). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_17
Irwansyah, F. S., Nur Asyiah, E., Maylawati, D. S., Farida, I., & Ramdhani, M. A. (2020). The development of augmented reality applications for chemistry learning. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 159–183). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_9
Grunewald Nichele, A., & do Nascimento, G. (2017). Augmented reality in teaching chemistry. In INTED2017 proceedings (pp. 8736–8743). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.2069
Harb, G. (2019). Reshaping undergraduates research experience with station rotation learning model. International Journal of Advanced Research, 7(11), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/10061
Hart, C. (2020). The romantic app: Augmented reality in fine art education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 159–183). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_16
Kljun, M., Geroimenko, V., & Čopič Pucihar, K. (2020). Augmented reality in education: Current status and advancement of the field. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 3–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_1
Keane, T., Linden, T., Hernandez-Martinez, P., Molnar, A., & Blicblau, A. (2022). Digital technologies: Students’ expectations and experiences during their transition from high school to university. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11184-4
Kolbina, T., & Oleksenko, O. (2020). Implementation of distance learning in Ukraine. Educational Challenges, 25(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2020.25.1.04
Lazinski, M., Ross, L., Wolf, S., Finck, M., & Cherry, L. (2021). Interprofessional education at a distance: The hybrid interprofessional education model. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 19(3), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2021.2011
Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Learning strategies in self-directed language learning using mobile technology in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7749–7780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10945-5
Le, H., & Nguyen, M. (2020). An online platform for enhancing learning experiences with web-based augmented reality and pictorial bar code. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 45–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_3
Lichty, P. (2020). Making inside the augment: Augmented reality and art/design education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 261–278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_15
Long, H. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2022). Calculators and online games: Supporting students with learning disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 58(4), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512221093787
Mladenovic, R. (2020). The usage of augmented reality in dental education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 139–157). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_8
Mozelius, P., Jaldemark, J., Eriksson Bergström, S., & Sundgren, M. (2020). The concept of ‘Bringing your own device’ in scaffolded and augmented education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 59–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_4
Nazarenko, A. L. (2015). Blended learning vs traditional learning: What works? (A case study research). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.018
Paramita, A., Yulia, C., & Nikmawati, E. E. (2021). Augmented reality in nutrition education. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1098, Article 022108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1098/2/022108
Peddie, J. (2017). Types of augmented reality. In Augmented reality (pp. 29–46). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54502-8_2
Puspita, A., Bahri, A., & Latif, R. (2022). Bleanded learning dengan model pembelajaran maraja. Biology Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.35580/btl.v5i2.37770
Raghaw, M., Paulose, J., & Goswami, B. (2018). Augmented reality for history education. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.6), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.6.10136
Rudnik, Y. (2023). The use of augmented reality and virtual reality technologies in teaching foreign languages. Educological Discourse, 43(1), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2023.110
Ruiz-Ariza, A., López-Serrano, S., Suárez-Manzano, S., & Martínez-López, E. J. (2020). The educational use of the ‘Harry Potter: Wizards Unite’ augmented reality application. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 247–259). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_14
Saez-Lopez, J.-M., & Cozar-Gutierrez, R. (2020). Iberian cultures and augmented reality: Studies in elementary school education and initial teacher training. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 235–245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_13
Salinas, P. (2017). Augmented reality: Opportunity for developing spatial visualization and learning calculus. In G. Kurubacak & H. Altinpulluk (Eds.), Mobile technologies and augmented reality in open education (pp. 54–76). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2110-5.ch003
Santoveña-Casal, S., & Fernández Pérez, M. D. (2020). Sustainable distance education: Comparison of digital pedagogical models. Sustainability, 12(21), Article 9067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219067
Soberanes-Martín, A. (2021). Augmented reality: An educational resource for the nursing graduate. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Research anthology on nursing education and overcoming challenges in the workplace (pp. 150–170). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9161-1.ch010
Truitt, A. A., & Ku, H.-Y. (2018). A case study of third grade students’ perceptions of the station rotation blended learning model in the United States. Educational Media International, 55(2), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484042
Vaughan, N. D. (2021). Blended Learning and Shared Metacognition. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, C. R. Graham, & P. D. Moskal (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives, Volume 3 (pp. 282–299). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037736-23
Wolf, M., Söbke, H., & Baalsrud Hauge, J. (2020). Designing augmented reality applications as learning activity. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 23–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_2
Wong, S. F., Mahmud, M. M., & Wong, S. S. (2022). Blackboard and virtual station rotation model: Effectiveness of learning calculus. In ICIEI '22: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on information and education innovations (pp. 35–40). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3535735.3535741
Yan, L., Colleni, M., & Litts, B. K. (2020). Interacting across contexts: Augmented reality applications for developing the understanding of the Anthropocene. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 367–385). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_19
Zhang, D., Wang, M., & Wu, J. G. (2020). Design and implementation of augmented reality for English language education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 217–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
