University Students' Perceptions of Environmental Management and Citizen Participation in Public Policies in Mexico City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2025.06.25.12Keywords:
environmental agency, students, citizenship and environment, socio-environmental issues, political participationAbstract
This research investigates university students' perceptions of environmental management and citizen participation in Mexico City, emphasising the interplay between these elements. By analysing students' views, the study offers insights into how informed citizens can influence environmental decision-making. The study employed semi-structured interviews to gather qualitative data from university students. Inductive analysis and categorisation, along with word clouds, were used to process the information, enabling a comprehensive understanding of students' perceptions and identifying key themes. The research found that students possess knowledge about environmental management and citizen participation, but this knowledge is fragmented. Students noted that the current economic model limits the efficiency and development of environmental initiatives. They advocated for more integrated approaches that actively engage citizens in decision-making processes. Future research could incorporate quantitative metrics, such as surveys measuring student engagement and satisfaction with environmental initiatives. Tracking the number of student-led projects and their policy impacts could also provide valuable insights. Conclusion: The study highlights the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of environmental management practices and citizen participation initiatives. By promoting citizen-centric approaches, meaningful environmental changes can be achieved, fostering a more engaged and informed citizenry in Mexico City. This is one of the first qualitative studies focusing on the intersection of environmental management and citizen participation among university students in Mexico City, contributing to the scarce literature on youth perspectives in urban sustainability governance.
References
Adanma, U. M., & Ogunbiyi, E. O. (2024). A comparative review of global environmental policies for promoting sustainable development and economic growth. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i5.1147
Ai, Y.-H., Peng, D.-Y., & Xiong, H.-H. (2021). Impact of environmental regulation intensity on green technology innovation: From the perspective of political and business connections. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094862
Alfie-Cohen, M., & Garcia-Becerra, F. Y. (2022). A multi-stakeholder participatory methodology to facilitate socio-ecological climate change vulnerability–adaptation–resilience strategies: Application of the Q method. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 27(2), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09988-9
Allen, S. (2023). Employees’ perspectives on the costs and benefits of organizations’ environmental initiatives. Business & Society, 62(4), 787–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221113250
Andersson, E. (2018). Young people’s political participation: A public pedagogy challenge at the municipal level. YOUNG, 26(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308817729971
Barnes, T. D., & Beaulieu, E. (2018). Women politicians, institutions, and perceptions of corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 52, 134–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018774355
Baxter, S., Barnes, A., Lee, C., Mead, R., & Clowes, M. (2023). Increasing public participation and influence in local decision-making to address social determinants of health: A systematic review examining initiatives and theories. Local Government Studies, 49(5), 861–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2081551
Bergthaller, H. (2020). Ecocriticism, biopolitics, and ecological immunity. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2020.11.2.3542
Bourke, J. (2024). Using innovative communication pathways to reframe the perception of young people within the political establishment. Children & Society, 38(3), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12784
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2009). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Harvard University Press.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Chatziioannou, I., Alvarez-Icaza, L., Bakogiannis, E., Kyriakidis, C., & Chias-Becerril, L. (2020). A CLIOS analysis for the promotion of sustainable plans of mobility: The case of Mexico City. Applied Sciences, 10(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134556
Cobo-Rendón, R., García-Álvarez, D., Rendon, R. C., & Santana, J. (2024). Perception of the learning climate and its prediction of wellbeing in psychology students at a Chilean university. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1456878. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1456878
De St Croix, T., Mcgimpsey, I., & Owens, J. (2020). Feeding young people to the social investment machine: The financialisation of public services. Critical Social Policy, 40(3), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018319854890
Desheng, L., Jiakui, C., & Ning, Z. (2021). Political connections and green technology innovations under an environmental regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126778
Dibattista, I. (2022). Building a collective ecological identity: A multidisciplinary reflection. European Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 12, Article 11106. https://doi.org/10.3389/ejcmp.2022.11106
Furlong, C., & Vignoles, V. L. (2021). Social identification in collective climate activism: Predicting participation in the environmental movement, Extinction Rebellion. Identity. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15283488.2020.1856664
Galán Castro, E. A. (2021). Seguridad socioambiental. Hacia un programa de investigación desde una analítica de la gubernamentalidad. Espiral (Guadalajara), 28(82), 75–107.
Grassi, E. F. G., Portos, M., & Felicetti, A. (2024). Young people’s attitudes towards democracy and political participation: Evidence from a cross-European study. Government and Opposition, 59(2), 582–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.16
Guo, F., Luo, M., Zhao, H., Du, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Dong, J., & Zhang, D. (2024). Qualitative mechanisms of perceived indoor environmental quality on anxiety symptoms in university. Buildings, 14(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113530
Guzmán Fernández, K., Moreno-Calles, A. I., Casas, A., & Blancas, J. (2020). Contributions of urban collective gardens to local sustainability in Mexico City. Sustainability, 12(18), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187562
Helleve, A., Flodgren, G. M., Blanchard, L., Fismen, A.-S., Rutter, H., Mathisen, J. R., & Klepp, K.-I. (2023). Youth involvement in policy processes in public health, education, and social work: Protocol for a scoping review. Obesity Reviews, 24(S1), e13544. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13544
Kamada, H. (2024). Young people’s interaction with political information in Japan. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v16.i1.8613
Lahusen, C., & Kiess, J. (2020). The diverging presence of youth in public discourse: A comparative analysis of youth-related debates across countries and issue fields. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(5), 574–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219885426
Lee, C. (2021). Effects of government characteristics on the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 157(2), 563–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02675-x
Legrand, T., & Stone, D. (2021). Governing global policy: What IPE can learn from public policy? Policy and Society, 40(4), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1975218
Malona, S., Besedina, I., Prylypko, V., & Ostashova, V. (2023). The role of legal education in shaping the legal culture of the future: Strategies and prospects for development. Futurity Education, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.09.25.15
Melgar, F. C., Umaña, M. R., Vargas, M. I. R., Castro, E. A. G., & Herrera, A. L. R. (2023). Diagnóstico urbano-ambiental empleando la cuenca hidrográfica como unidad espacial de análisis. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(6), 5422–5444. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i6.9089
Melucci, A., & Massolo, A. (1991). La acción colectiva como construcción social. Estudios Sociológicos, 9(26), 357–364.
Menardo, E., Brondino, M., Damian, O., Lezcano, M., Marossi, C., & Pasini, M. (2024). Students’ perceived restorativeness of university environment: The validation of the Rest@U scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1348483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348483
Mohammadi, Y., Monavvarifard, F., Salehi, L., Movahedi, R., Karimi, S., & Liobikienė, G. (2023). Explaining the sustainability of universities through the contribution of students’ pro-environmental behavior and the management system. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021562
Nugent, A., & Radicic, D. (2023). The impact of environmental management on labour productivity. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612256
Pansera, M., Marsh, A., Owen, R., Flores López, J. A., & De Alba Ulloa, J. L. (2023). Exploring citizen participation in smart city development in Mexico City: An institutional logics approach. Organization Studies, 44(10), 1679–1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221094194
Pokharel, S., & Poudel, R. (2025). Local knowledge, perceptions, and impacts of climate change in Ligligkot, Gorkha, Nepal: The cultural ecology approach. Futurity of Social Sciences, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2025.03.20.04
Rojas-Casarrubias, C., Rodríguez-Alviso, C., Aparicio-López, J. L., Castro-Bello, M., Villerías-Salinas, S., & Bedolla-Solano, R. (2023). Problemas socioambientales desde la percepción de la comunidad: Pico del Monte-laguna de Chautengo, Guerrero. Sociedad y Ambiente, 26, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.vi26.2756
Sánchez Sánchez, R. (2021). El tema de validez de contenido en la educación y la propuesta de Hernández-Nieto. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 15(3), Article 9 (or page 9 if it's pagination).
Secretaría de Gobierno, S. (2022). Programa de Gobierno de la Ciudad de México 2019–2024, una propuesta para el desarrollo sostenible – CDMX 2030. https://agenda2030.cdmx.gob.mx/documentos/programa-de-gobierno-de-la-ciudad-de-mexico-2019-2024-una-propuesta-para-el-desarrollo-sostenible/
Sollis, K., Yap, M., Campbell, P., & Biddle, N. (2021). Conceptualisations of wellbeing and quality of life: A systematic review of participatory studies. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rfegt
Torres-Pachas, W., Pérez-Arboleda, P. A., Aparicio-Ballena, J. A., Riveros-Davalos, M., Mendoza-Banda, T. Y., & Vértiz-Osores, J. J. (2024). The challenges of effective public management in the fight against environmental pollution: A global perspective. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(4), e04583. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n4-029
Ugalde, E. G. (2024). Political invisibility: Structural realism and the Kahnawà:ke Mohawk Nation. Futurity of Social Sciences, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2024.03.20.06
Vasiliades, M. A., Hadjichambis, A. C., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Adamou, A., & Georgiou, Y. (2021). A systematic literature review on the participation aspects of environmental and nature-based citizen science initiatives. Sustainability, 13(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137457
Zaharudin, Z. A., Shuib, A., Hadianti, R., & Rodzi, Z. M. (2023). Towards sustainable city: A covering model for recycling facility location-allocation in Nilai, Malaysia. Science and Technology Indonesia, 8(4), Article 4, 570–578. https://doi.org/10.26554/sti.2023.8.4.570-578
Zhang, S. (2019). Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities, 85, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
