School Organizational Democracy and School Development: A Chain-Mediated Model of Organizational Commitment and Work Engagement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2025.06.25.02

Keywords:

school organizational democracy, school development, organizational commitment, work engagement, teacher participation

Abstract

School organizational democracy is increasingly recognized as a cornerstone for modern educational governance. However, empirical studies examining its impact on school development within the Chinese context remain limited. This study explores the relationship between school organizational democracy and school development, emphasizing the mediating roles of organizational commitment and work engagement. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 3,599 teachers across 74 schools in China. Using SPSS 26.0 and the PROCESS macro, descriptive statistics, multiple regression, and mediation analyses were performed. The results indicate that school organizational democracy and its key dimensions—freedom of expression, collective decision-making, supervision and accountability, openness and transparency, and equality and fairness—positively predict school development (B = 0.208–0.341, p < 0.001). Moreover, organizational commitment significantly mediates this relationship (effect sizes: 0.271–0.338). Additionally, work engagement and the sequential path “organizational commitment → work engagement” further mediate the impact of specific dimensions of organizational democracy on school development. These findings provide a theoretical and practical foundation for enhancing school participatory governance, particularly in emerging educational systems.

References

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

Ahmed, K., & Ahmed, A. (2022). The rationale and development of organizational democracy scale. Business and Politics, 24(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.5

Aldabbas, H., Pinnington, A., Lahrech, A., & Blaique, L. (2025). Extrinsic rewards for employee creativity? The role of perceived organisational support, work engagement and intrinsic motivation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0165

Battilana, J., Yen, J., Ferreras, I., & Ramarajan, L. (2022). Democratizing work: Redistributing power in organizations for a democratic and sustainable future. Organization Theory, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221103973

Baumgartner, H., Weijters, B., & Pieters, R. (2021). The biasing effect of common method variance: Some clarifications. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00766-8

Bilge, H., Barbuta-Misu, N., Zungun, D., Virlanuta, O., & Guven, H. (2020). Organizational democracy in the private sector: A field research. Sustainability, 12(8), 3446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083446

Briones, G. E. (2024). La libertad de expresión desde una perspectiva constitucionalista y democrática. Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, 31, e122. https://doi.org/10.24215/18522971e122

Burdin, G. (2016). Equality under threat by the talented: Evidence from worker-managed firms. The Economic Journal, 126(594), 1372–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12272

Cao, Z. Q. (2023). Teacher-perceived school organizational democracy: Structure, status, and its impact on school performance (Doctoral dissertation, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China).

Cheng, H. Y., & Zhou, J. S. (2018). The role and limitation of democracy in school education. Journal of Educational Studies, 14(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.14082/j.cnki.1673-1298.2018.02.010

Chu, H. Q. (2021). Drawing a panorama of educational governance: Concept expansion and system improvement. Educational Research, 42(12), 105–119.

Conley, S. (1991). Chapter 6: Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making. Review of Research in Education, 17(1), 225–266. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732x017001225

Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery, and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X84020003003

Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Morrison, R. L. (2018). Give and take: Needed updates to social exchange theory. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(3), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.101

Cunningham, F. (2002). Theories of democracy: A critical introduction (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

Deitcher, D. B., & Alon, R. (2025). Special education preschool teachers' stress and well-being during wartime: Relations with psychological capital, occupational self-efficacy, and social support. Psychology in the Schools, 62(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23584

Duan, J. Y., & Ling, B. (2011). A Chinese indigenous study of the construct of employee voice behavior and the influence of Zhongyong on it. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(10), 1185–1197.

Duan, J. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2013). The mechanism of employee's sense of power on speaking-up: A power cognition perspective. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00217

Ducasse, P. (2016). Democracy at work: Happier and more productive workplaces are within reach. CCPA Monitor, 22(5), 32–33.

Guerci, M., Hauff, S., Panichella, N., & Radaelli, G. (2023). Sustainable HRM and class-based inequality. Personnel Review, 52(5), 1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2021-0772

Gunatilleke, G. (2021). Justifying limitations on the freedom of expression. Human Rights Review, 22(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00608-8

Hamel, G. (2013). Na čem dnes záleží: jak vyhrát ve světě neustálých změn, dravé konkurence a nezastavitelné inovace. Praha: People Comm.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Heller, F., Pusic, E., Strauss, G., & Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational participation: Myth and reality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198288510.001.0001

Huong, V. T. M., Hue, H. T. K., Chau, D. T. M., Nguyet, N. T. M., Quy, T. T., & Tri, N. Q. (2024). A dataset on analysis of school-based management research from 1984 to 2023. Data in Brief, 56, 110823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110823

Islam, T., Sharif, S., Ali, H. F., & Jamil, S. (2024). Zooming into paternalistic leadership: Evidence from high power distance culture. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 33(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-05-2021-0149

Jarley, P., Fiorito, J., & Delaney, J. T. (1997). A structural contingency approach to bureaucracy and democracy in US national unions. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 831–861.

Ji, D., & Cui, L. (2021). Relationship between total rewards perceptions and work engagement among Chinese kindergarten teachers: Organizational identification as a mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648729

Kenny, D. A. (2008). Reflections on mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107308978

Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2012). Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0018

Li, Y. P., Yang, T., Pan, Y. J., & Xu, J. (2012). Building and implementation of inclusive leadership: From the perspective of new generation employee management. Human Resource Development, (3), 31–35. https://doi.org/71/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2012.03.018

Liu, D., & Du, R. (2024). Psychological capital, mindfulness, and teacher burnout: Insights from Chinese EFL educators through structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1351912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351912

Lu, H. Y. (2014). Industrial democracy: Theory, practice and its application in China. Zhejiang Academic Journal, (3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.16235/j.cnki.33-1005/c.2014.03.017

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246

Moore, J. R., Maxey, E. C., Waite, A. M., & Wendover, J. D. (2020). Inclusive organizations: Developmental reciprocity through authentic leader-employee relationships. Journal of Management Development, 39(9/10), 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-05-2019-0211

Nakonezny, P. A., & Denton, W. H. (2008). Marital relationships: A social exchange theory perspective. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(5), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180701647264

Nath, A. G. (2025). Scientific management reimagined: An institutional entrepreneurship perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2024-4799

Or, M. H., & Berkovich, I. (2023). Participative decision making in schools in individualist and collectivist cultures: The micro-politics behind distributed leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(3), 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211001364

Park, J. H., Cooc, N., & Lee, K. H. (2023). Relationships between teacher influence in managerial and instruction-related decision-making, job satisfaction, and professional commitment: A multivariate multilevel model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220971287

Peng, W., & Nair, S. M. (2022). Teachers' participation in decision-making, professional growth, appraisal, and behavioral intentions in the promotion system reform in Chinese universities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 932324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932324

Rice, E. M., & Schneider, G. T. (1994). A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980–1991. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 43–58.

Rosenholtz, S. J., Bassler, O., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. (1986). Organizational conditions of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(86)90008-9

Salmerón-Gómez, R., García-García, C. B., & García-Pérez, J. (2025). A redefined variance inflation factor: Overcoming the limitations of the variance inflation factor. Computational Economics, 65, 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10575-8

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Torun, Ç. H. (2021). Aile işletmelerinde örgütsel demokrasinin inovasyona etkisi (Order No. 31785627). ProQuest One Academic. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/aile-ışletmelerinde-örgütsel-demokrasinin/docview/3150056991/se-2

Uline, C. L., Miller, D. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(4), 462–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X98034004002

Vickers, I., Lyon, F., & Sepulveda, L. (2025). Collective capabilities for organizational democracy: The case of mutual social enterprises. British Journal of Management, 36, 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12840

Viggian, F. A. (2011). Phoenix Trucking—"I believe in democracy up to a point": Democratizing management hierarchies. International Journal of Management & Innovation, 3(1), 1–31.

Viggiani, F. A. (1997). Democratic hierarchies in the workplace: Structural dilemmas and organizational action. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 18(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X97182004

Volante, P., Jeldres, R., Spero, K., Llorente, C., & Johanek, M. C. (2020). Simulations for the learning of decision making in educational leadership in the context of the Chilean school system. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 5(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.1.1

Wang, F., & Shi, W. (2021). Inclusive leadership and pro-social rule breaking: The role of psychological safety, leadership identification and leader-member exchange. Psychological Reports, 124(5), 2155–2179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120953558

Wang, S. (2018). Organizational democracy. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3233618

Watkins, D. (2008). Conceptualizing democracy in a global era (Order No. 3328462). ProQuest One Academic. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/conceptualizing-democracy-global-era/docview/304440622/se-2

Watts, C. S. (2024). Teacher retention and school characteristics in Tennessee: A human relations theory correlation study (Order No. 31335554). ProQuest One Academic. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/teacher-retention-school-characteristics/docview/3076814609/se-2

Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Höge, T. (2020). Psychological research on organisational democracy: A meta-analysis of individual, organisational, and societal outcomes. Applied Psychology, 69, 1009–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12205

Whillas, E. (2021). Increasing community engagement in NYC’s green-space planning with PPGIS and deliberative democracy (Order No. 30610586). ProQuest One Academic. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/increasing-community-engagement-nyc-s-green-space/docview/2833111975/se-2

Yang, X. W. (2020). From high quality to modernization: The goal and evaluation of school development. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (11), 20–25.

Yin, D., & Tian, J. R. (2016). Articles of basic education schools in our country: Historical evolution, realistic introspection and improvement strategy. Modern Education Management, (5), 43. https://doi.org/10.16697/j.cnki.xdjygl.2016.05.008

Zagenczyk, T. J., Purvis, R. L., Cruz, K. S., Thoroughgood, C. N., & Sawyer, K. B. (2021). Context and social exchange: Perceived ethical climate strengthens the relationships between perceived organizational support and organizational identification and commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(22), 4752–4771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1706618

Zhang, X., Kou, J. H., Zhang, X., & Lv, G. M. (2021). The determinants of school district housing premium from the perspective of school quality. Journal of Financial Research, (11), 97–116.

Zhang, Z. Q. (2005). An analysis of internal factors affecting school development. Foreign Education Research, 32(9), 7–11.

Zhao, D., Li, Q., & Cao, Z. (2024). Workplace democracy and work engagement in elementary and secondary schools: A moderated mediation model. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00733-1

Zhi, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). An investigation into Chinese English teachers’ organizational commitment: Do emotion regulation and workplace buoyancy matter? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00888-5

Zhou, L., Liu, Y., Ren, L., et al. (2025). How does perceived organizational support promote expatriates’ taking charge behavior: The roles of psychological ownership and the subsidiary support climate. Current Psychology, 44, 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07161-4

Zhou, Z. J. (2019). Enhancing school democratic management through multiple measures. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (5), 103.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-06

How to Cite

Cao, Z., He, L., Dai, Y., & Xiang, L. (2025). School Organizational Democracy and School Development: A Chain-Mediated Model of Organizational Commitment and Work Engagement. Futurity Education, 5(2), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2025.06.25.02