Learning beyond the classroom: A qualitative study of Student Clubs in Greek Model and Experimental High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2026.03.02Keywords:
extracurricular school activities, clubs, learning process, learning communities, educational innovation.Abstract
This study examines the learning processes developed within student clubs in Greek Model and Experimental High Schools (MEHS), a category of public secondary schools assigned an institutional role in piloting and disseminating innovative educational practices. Although MEHS clubs are formally embedded in the public education system, their pedagogical functioning as structured learning environments remains largely undocumented in educational research and policy discourse. The study aims to analyse the pedagogical characteristics of learning in MEHS clubs and assess their relevance to improving teaching and learning practices in formal upper secondary education. A qualitative research design was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 27 teachers and focus group discussions with 72 students from seven MEHS in the Attica region. The data were analysed using thematic qualitative content analysis, supported by methodological triangulation across data sources and participant groups. The findings reveal systematic differences between club-based learning and conventional classroom instruction. Learning in clubs is organised around collaborative, inquiry-based, and experiential practices, with limited emphasis on curriculum coverage and examination-oriented assessment. Students assume active roles in planning, decision-making, and task implementation, while responsibilities are primarily shaped by voluntary engagement and collective goals. Teachers adopt facilitative and coordinating roles, supporting horizontal interaction and shared ownership of learning processes. Both teachers and students identify clubs as learning communities that enhance student participation, agency, and engagement. The study demonstrates that MEHS clubs function as structured non-formal learning settings within public secondary education. Its scientific contribution lies in providing empirical evidence on the pedagogical operation of MEHS clubs. From a policy perspective, the results indicate that selected features of club-based learning — particularly collaborative inquiry, student initiative-taking, and facilitative teaching roles — can inform the design of pedagogical innovation and support curriculum and school-level reform, subject to institutional constraints.
References
Bagakis, G., & MacBeath, J. (Eds.). (2008). Leadership that facilitates learning. Livanis. https://www.livanis.gr
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/9781594517742
Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. Learning and Skills Research Centre. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:25738
Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/9780415337908
Darling, N., Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, R. (2005). Participation in school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950040
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan. https://archive.org/details/experienceeducat00dewe
Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., & Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 865–889. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00095.x
Ecclestone, K. (2009). Lost and found in transition: Educational implications of concerns about “identity,” “agency”, and “structure.” In J. Field, J. Gallacher, & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching transitions in lifelong learning (pp. 9–27). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/9780415472418
Flick, U. (2017). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/an-introduction-to-qualitative-research/book245857
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Is extracurricular participation associated with beneficial outcomes? Concurrent and longitudinal relations. Developmental Psychology, 42(4), 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.4.698
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: Are there developmental benefits for African American and European American youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9304-8
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New rev. ed.). Penguin. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/29915/
Frydaki, E. (2009). Teaching at the intersection of modern and postmodern thought. Kritiki. https://www.kritiki.gr
Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. In B. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding boundaries: Serving and learning (pp. 2–6). https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/128/
Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2011). Constructionism, learning by design and project-based learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. (Посилання “file:/// …” є локальним і не придатним для References; потрібен веб-URL або видавничі дані.)
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–423). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/9780805863520
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2013). New learning: Elements of a science of education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/9781107013186
Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1999). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach (2nd ed.). Ablex. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED466019
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. https://learningfromexperience.com
Kort-Butler, L. A., & Hagewen, K. J. (2011). School-based extracurricular activity involvement and adolescent self-esteem: A growth-curve analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(5), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9561-5
Kyriakodi, D., & Tzimogiannis, A. (2015). Educational innovations in primary education: A study of award-winning projects under the “Excellence and Best Practices” initiative. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 8(3), 123–151. http://www.earthlab.uoi.gr/theste/
Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.170
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/9780521423748
MacBeath, J. (2012). Future of teaching profession. Education International. https://www.education-international.org
Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Lord, H. (2003). Organized activities as developmental contexts for children and adolescents. In F. Jacobs, D. Wertlieb, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science(pp. 3–22). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com
Peck, S. C., Roeser, R. W., Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Exploring the roles of extracurricular activity participation in the identity development of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9325-3
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, S. (2012). Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9, 81–95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259569396
Schusler, T. M., Krasny, M. E., Peters, S. J., & Decker, D. J. (2009). Developing citizens and communities through youth environmental action. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802673250
Spyropoulou, D., Anastasakis, A., Deligianni, D., Koutra, C., & Bouras, S. (2008). Innovative programs in primary and secondary education: Functional penetration and sustainability. http://repository.edulll.gr/edulll/handle/10795/109
Stoll, L., & Kools, M. (2017). The school as a learning organisation: A review revisiting and extending a timely concept (OECD Education Working Papers No. 137). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b4d8fbb2-en
Theodoropoulos, N. (2019). Innovation in public schools: Teachers’ perceptions and practices in primary and secondary education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Patras). https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/45219
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation. https://www.bie.org/files/researchreviewPBL_1.pdf
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass. https://www.wiley.com
Tsiolis, G. (2018). Qualitative research and content analysis. Kritiki. https://www.kritiki.gr
Vasileiou, D. (2024). The peer groups of excellence, creativity, and innovation in the model and experimental high schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Peloponnese). http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/57068
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/9780674576292
Zaff, J. F., Moore, K. A., Papillo, A. R., & Williams, S. (2003). Implications of extracurricular activity participation during adolescence on positive outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18(6), 599–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258283
Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press. https://www.tcpress.com/building-academic-success-on-social-and-emotional-learning-9780807744390
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
